Chú thích Thiên_kiến_xác_nhận

  1. (Baron 2000, tr. 195)
  2. 1 2 Plous 1993, tr. 233
  3. Nickerson, Raymond S. (tháng 6 năm 1998). “Confirmation Bias: A Ubiquitous Phenomenon in Many Guises”. Review of General Psychology 2 (2): 175–220. doi:10.1037/1089-2680.2.2.175||ngày truy cập= cần |url= (trợ giúp)
  4. Darley, John M.; Gross, Paget H. (2000), “A Hypothesis-Confirming Bias in Labelling Effects”, trong Stangor, Charles, Stereotypes and prejudice: essential readings, Psychology Press, tr. 212, ISBN 978-0-86377-589-5, OCLC 42823720 
  5. Risen & Gilovich 2007
  6. 1 2 3 Zweig, Jason (ngày 19 tháng 11 năm 2009), “How to Ignore the Yes-Man in Your Head”, Wall Street Journal (Dow Jones & Company), truy cập ngày 13 tháng 6 năm 2010 
  7. Nickerson 1998, tr. 177–178Lỗi harv: nhiều mục tiêu (2×): CITEREFNickerson1998 (trợ giúp)
  8. 1 2 3 4 Kunda 1999, tr. 112–115
  9. 1 2 Baron 2000, tr. 162–164
  10. Kida 2006, tr. 162–165
  11. Devine, Patricia G.; Hirt, Edward R.; Gehrke, Elizabeth M. (1990), “Diagnostic and confirmation strategies in trait hypothesis testing”, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (American Psychological Association) 58 (6): 952–963, ISSN 1939-1315, doi:10.1037/0022-3514.58.6.952 
  12. Trope, Yaacov; Bassok, Miriam (1982), “Confirmatory and diagnosing strategies in social information gathering”, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (American Psychological Association) 43 (1): 22–34, ISSN 1939-1315, doi:10.1037/0022-3514.43.1.22 
  13. 1 2 3 Klayman, Joshua; Ha, Young-Won (1987), “Confirmation, Disconfirmation and Information in Hypothesis Testing” (PDF), Psychological Review (American Psychological Association) 94 (2): 211–228, ISSN 0033-295X, doi:10.1037/0033-295X.94.2.211, truy cập ngày 14 tháng 8 năm 2009 
  14. 1 2 3 Oswald & Grosjean 2004, tr. 82–83
  15. Kunda, Ziva; Fong, G.T.; Sanitoso, R.; Reber, E. (1993), “Directional questions direct self-conceptions”, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology (Society of Experimental Social Psychology) 29: 62–63, ISSN 0022-1031  via Fine 2006, tr. 63–65
  16. Kida 2006, tr. 157
  17. 1 2 3 4 5 6 Lord, Charles G.; Ross, Lee; Lepper, Mark R. (1979), “Biased assimilation and attitude polarization: The effects of prior theories on subsequently considered evidence”, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (American Psychological Association) 37 (11): 2098–2109, ISSN 0022-3514, doi:10.1037/0022-3514.37.11.2098 
  18. 1 2 Baron 2000, tr. 201–202
  19. Vyse 1997, tr. 122
  20. 1 2 3 4 Taber, Charles S.; Lodge, Milton (tháng 7 năm 2006), “Motivated Skepticism in the Evaluation of Political Beliefs”, American Journal of Political Science (Midwest Political Science Association) 50 (3): 755–769, ISSN 0092-5853, doi:10.1111/j.1540-5907.2006.00214.x 
  21. 1 2 3 Westen, Drew; Blagov, Pavel S.; Harenski, Keith; Kilts, Clint; Hamann, Stephan (2006), “Neural Bases of Motivated Reasoning: An fMRI Study of Emotional Constraints on Partisan Political Judgment in the 2004 U.S. Presidential Election”, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) 18 (11): 1947–1958, PMID 17069484, doi:10.1162/jocn.2006.18.11.1947, truy cập ngày 14 tháng 8 năm 2009 
  22. 1 2 Stanovich, K. E.; West, R. F.; Toplak, M. E. (2013). “Myside Bias, Rational Thinking, and Intelligence”. Current Directions in Psychological Science 22 (4): 259–264. doi:10.1177/0963721413480174
  23. Gadenne, V.; Oswald, M. (1986), “Entstehung und Veränderung von Bestätigungstendenzen beim Testen von Hypothesen [Formation and alteration of confirmatory tendencies during the testing of hypotheses]”, Zeitschrift für experimentelle und angewandte Psychologie 33: 360–374  via Oswald & Grosjean 2004, tr. 89
  24. Hastie, Reid; Park, Bernadette (2005), “The Relationship Between Memory and Judgment Depends on Whether the Judgment Task is Memory-Based or On-Line”, trong Hamilton, David L., Social cognition: key readings, New York: Psychology Press, tr. 394, ISBN 0-86377-591-8, OCLC 55078722 
  25. 1 2 3 Oswald & Grosjean 2004, tr. 88–89
  26. Stangor, Charles; McMillan, David (1992), “Memory for expectancy-congruent and expectancy-incongruent information: A review of the social and social developmental literatures”, Psychological Bulletin (American Psychological Association) 111 (1): 42–61, doi:10.1037/0033-2909.111.1.42 
  27. 1 2 Snyder, M.; Cantor, N. (1979), “Testing hypotheses about other people: the use of historical knowledge”, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 15 (4): 330–342, doi:10.1016/0022-1031(79)90042-8  via Goldacre 2008, tr. 231
  28. Kunda 1999, tr. 225–232
  29. Sanitioso, Rasyid; Kunda, Ziva; Fong, G.T. (1990), “Motivated recruitment of autobiographical memories”, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (American Psychological Association) 59 (2): 229–241, ISSN 0022-3514, PMID 2213492, doi:10.1037/0022-3514.59.2.229 
  30. 1 2 3 Levine, L.; Prohaska, V.; Burgess, S.L.; Rice, J.A.; Laulhere, T.M. (2001). “Remembering past emotions: The role of current appraisals.”. Cognition and Emotion 15: 393–417. doi:10.1080/02699930125955
  31. 1 2 Safer, M.A.; Bonanno, G.A.; Field, N. (2001). “"It was never that bad": Biased recall of grief and long-term adjustment to the death of a spouse”. Memory 9 (3): 195–203. doi:10.1080/09658210143000065
  32. 1 2 Russell, Dan; Jones, Warren H. (1980), “When superstition fails: Reactions to disconfirmation of paranormal beliefs”, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin (Society for Personality and Social Psychology) 6 (1): 83–88, ISSN 1552-7433, doi:10.1177/014616728061012  via Vyse 1997, tr. 121
  33. 1 2 3 Kuhn, Deanna; Lao, Joseph (tháng 3 năm 1996), “Effects of Evidence on Attitudes: Is Polarization the Norm?”, Psychological Science (American Psychological Society) 7 (2): 115–20, doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.1996.tb00340.x 
  34. Baron 2000, tr. 201
  35. Miller, A.G.; McHoskey, J.W.; Bane, C.M.; Dowd, T.G. (1993), “The attitude polarization phenomenon: Role of response measure, attitude extremity, and behavioral consequences of reported attitude change”, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 64 (4): 561–574, doi:10.1037/0022-3514.64.4.561 
  36. “backfire effect”. The Skeptic's Dictionary. Truy cập ngày 26 tháng 4 năm 2012. 
  37. Silverman, Craig (ngày 17 tháng 6 năm 2011). “The Backfire Effect”. Columbia Journalism Review. Truy cập ngày 1 tháng 5 năm 2012. When your deepest convictions are challenged by contradictory evidence, your beliefs get stronger. 
  38. Nyhan, Brendan; Reifler, Jason (2010). “When Corrections Fail: The Persistence of Political Misperceptions” (PDF). Political Behavior 32 (2): 303–330. doi:10.1007/s11109-010-9112-2. Truy cập ngày 1 tháng 5 năm 2012. 
  39. 1 2 3 4 Ross, Lee; Anderson, Craig A. (1982), “Shortcomings in the attribution process: On the origins and maintenance of erroneous social assessments”, trong Kahneman, Daniel; Slovic, Paul; Tversky, Amos, Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases, Cambridge University Press, tr. 129–152, ISBN 978-0-521-28414-1, OCLC 7578020 
  40. 1 2 3 4 Nickerson 1998, tr. 187Lỗi harv: nhiều mục tiêu (2×): CITEREFNickerson1998 (trợ giúp)
  41. Kunda 1999, tr. 99
  42. Ross, Lee; Lepper, Mark R.; Hubbard, Michael (1975), “Perseverance in self-perception and social perception: Biased attributional processes in the debriefing paradigm”, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (American Psychological Association) 32 (5): 880–892, ISSN 0022-3514, PMID 1185517, doi:10.1037/0022-3514.32.5.880  via Kunda 1999, tr. 99
  43. 1 2 3 Anderson, Craig A.; Lepper, Mark R.; Ross, Lee (1980), “Perseverance of Social Theories: The Role of Explanation in the Persistence of Discredited Information”, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (American Psychological Association) 39 (6): 1037–1049, ISSN 0022-3514, doi:10.1037/h0077720 
  44. 1 2 3 4 5 Baron 2000, tr. 197–200
  45. 1 2 3 Fine 2006, tr. 66–70
  46. 1 2 Plous 1993, tr. 164–166
  47. Redelmeir, D. A.; Tversky, Amos (1996), “On the belief that arthritis pain is related to the weather”, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 93 (7): 2895–2896, doi:10.1073/pnas.93.7.2895  via Kunda 1999, tr. 127
  48. 1 2 3 Kunda 1999, tr. 127–130
  49. Plous 1993, tr. 162–164
  50. Adapted from Fielder, Klaus (2004), “Illusory correlation”, trong Pohl, Rüdiger F., Cognitive Illusions: A Handbook on Fallacies and Biases in Thinking, Judgement and Memory, Hove, UK: Psychology Press, tr. 103, ISBN 978-1-84169-351-4, OCLC 55124398 
  51. Stanovich, K. E.; West, R. F.; Toplak, M. E. (ngày 5 tháng 8 năm 2013). “Myside Bias, Rational Thinking, and Intelligence”. Current Directions in Psychological Science 22 (4): 259–264. doi:10.1177/0963721413480174
  52. Baron, Jonathan (1995). “Myside bias in thinking about abortion.”. Thinking & Reasoning: 221–235. 
  53. 1 2 Wolfe, Christopher; Anne Britt (2008). “The locus of the myside bias in written argumentation.”. Thinking & Reasoning: 1–27. 
  54. Mason, Lucia; Scirica, Fabio (tháng 10 năm 2006). “Prediction of students' argumentation skills about controversial topics by epistemological understanding”. Learning and Instruction 16 (5): 492–509. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2006.09.007
  55. Weinstock, Michael (tháng 12 năm 2009). “Relative expertise in an everyday reasoning task: Epistemic understanding, problem representation, and reasoning competence”. Learning and Individual Differences 19 (4): 423–434. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2009.03.003
  56. Weinstock, Michael; Neuman, Yair; Tabak, Iris (tháng 1 năm 2004). “Missing the point or missing the norms? Epistemological norms as predictors of students' ability to identify fallacious arguments”. Contemporary Educational Psychology 29 (1): 77–94. doi:10.1016/S0361-476X(03)00024-9
  57. 1 2 Baron 2000, tr. 195–196
  58. Thucydides 4.108.4
  59. Alighieri, Dante. Paradiso canto XIII: 118–120. Trans. Allen Mandelbaum
  60. 1 2 Bacon, Francis (1620). Novum Organum. reprinted in Burtt, E.A. biên tập (1939), The English philosophers from Bacon to Mill, New York: Random House, tr. 36  via Nickerson 1998, tr. 176Lỗi harv: nhiều mục tiêu (2×): CITEREFNickerson1998 (trợ giúp)
  61. Tolstoy, Leo. What is Art? tr. 124 (1899).
  62. Dịch từ phiên bản của Constance Garnett, New York, 1894. Phiên bản Dự án Gutenberg phát hành tháng 11 năm 2002. Truy cập ngày 1-8-2014.
  63. Gale, Maggie; Ball, Linden J. (2002), “Does Positivity Bias Explain Patterns of Performance on Wason's 2-4-6 task?”, trong Gray, Wayne D.; Schunn, Christian D., Proceedings of the Twenty-Fourth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, Routledge, tr. 340, ISBN 978-0-8058-4581-5, OCLC 469971634 
  64. 1 2 Wason, Peter C. (1960), “On the failure to eliminate hypotheses in a conceptual task”, Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology (Psychology Press) 12 (3): 129–140, ISSN 1747-0226, doi:10.1080/17470216008416717 
  65. Nickerson 1998, tr. 179Lỗi harv: nhiều mục tiêu (2×): CITEREFNickerson1998 (trợ giúp)
  66. Lewicka 1998, tr. 238
  67. (Poletiek 2001, tr. 73)
  68. Oswald & Grosjean 2004, tr. 79–96
  69. Wason, Peter C. (1968), “Reasoning about a rule”, Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology (Psychology Press) 20 (3): 273–28, ISSN 1747-0226, doi:10.1080/14640746808400161 
  70. 1 2 3 Sutherland, Stuart (2007), Irrationality (ấn bản 2), London: Pinter and Martin, tr. 95–103, ISBN 978-1-905177-07-3, OCLC 72151566 
  71. Barkow, Jerome H.; Cosmides, Leda; Tooby, John (1995), The adapted mind: evolutionary psychology and the generation of culture, Oxford University Press US, tr. 181–184, ISBN 978-0-19-510107-2, OCLC 33832963 
  72. Oswald & Grosjean 2004, tr. 81–82, 86–87
  73. Lewicka 1998, tr. 239
  74. Tweney, Ryan D.; Doherty, Michael E.; Worner, Winifred J.; Pliske, Daniel B.; Mynatt, Clifford R.; Gross, Kimberly A.; Arkkelin, Daniel L. (1980), “Strategies of rule discovery in an inference task”, The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology (Psychology Press) 32 (1): 109–123, ISSN 1747-0226, doi:10.1080/00335558008248237  (Experiment IV)
  75. Oswald & Grosjean 2004, tr. 86–89
  76. 1 2 Hergovich, Schott & Burger 2010
  77. Maccoun 1998
  78. Friedrich 1993, tr. 298
  79. Kunda 1999, tr. 94
  80. Nickerson 1998, tr. 198–199Lỗi harv: nhiều mục tiêu (2×): CITEREFNickerson1998 (trợ giúp)
  81. Nickerson 1998, tr. 200Lỗi harv: nhiều mục tiêu (2×): CITEREFNickerson1998 (trợ giúp)
  82. 1 2 3 Nickerson 1998, tr. 197Lỗi harv: nhiều mục tiêu (2×): CITEREFNickerson1998 (trợ giúp)
  83. Baron 2000, tr. 206
  84. Matlin, Margaret W. (2004), “Pollyanna Principle”, trong Pohl, Rüdiger F., Cognitive Illusions: A Handbook on Fallacies and Biases in Thinking, Judgement and Memory, Hove: Psychology Press, tr. 255–272, ISBN 978-1-84169-351-4, OCLC 55124398 
  85. Dawson, Erica; Gilovich, Thomas; Regan, Dennis T. (tháng 10 năm 2002), “Motivated Reasoning and Performance on the Wason Selection Task”, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin (Society for Personality and Social Psychology) 28 (10): 1379–1387, doi:10.1177/014616702236869, truy cập ngày 30 tháng 9 năm 2009 
  86. Ditto, Peter H.; Lopez, David F. (1992), “Motivated skepticism: use of differential decision criteria for preferred and nonpreferred conclusions”, Journal of personality and social psychology (American Psychological Association) 63 (4): 568–584, ISSN 0022-3514, doi:10.1037/0022-3514.63.4.568 
  87. Nickerson 1998, tr. 198Lỗi harv: nhiều mục tiêu (2×): CITEREFNickerson1998 (trợ giúp)
  88. Oswald & Grosjean 2004, tr. 91–93
  89. Friedrich 1993, tr. 299, 316–317
  90. Trope, Y.; Liberman, A. (1996), “Social hypothesis testing: cognitive and motivational mechanisms”, trong Higgins, E. Tory; Kruglanski, Arie W., Social Psychology: Handbook of basic principles, New York: Guilford Press, ISBN 978-1-57230-100-9, OCLC 34731629  via Oswald & Grosjean 2004, tr. 91–93
  91. 1 2 Dardenne, Benoit; Leyens, Jacques-Philippe (1995), “Confirmation Bias as a Social Skill”, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin (Society for Personality and Social Psychology) 21 (11): 1229–39, ISSN 1552-7433, doi:10.1177/01461672952111011 
  92. Shanteau, James (2003). Sandra L. Schneider, biên tập. Emerging perspectives on judgment and decision research. Cambridge [u.a.]: Cambridge University Press. tr. 445. ISBN 0-521-52718-X
  93. Haidt, Jonathan (2012). The Righteous Mind: Why Good People are Divided by Politics and Religion. New York: Pantheon Books. tr. 1473–4 (e–book edition). ISBN 0-307-37790-3
  94. Lindzey, edited by Susan T. Fiske, Daniel T. Gilbert, Gardner (2010). The handbook of social psychology. (ấn bản 5). Hoboken, N.J.: Wiley. tr. 811. ISBN 0-470-13749-5
  95. Pompian, Michael M. (2006), Behavioral finance and wealth management: how to build optimal portfolios that account for investor biases, John Wiley and Sons, tr. 187–190, ISBN 978-0-471-74517-4, OCLC 61864118 
  96. Hilton, Denis J. (2001), “The psychology of financial decision-making: Applications to trading, dealing, and investment analysis”, Journal of Behavioral Finance (Institute of Behavioral Finance) 2 (1): 37–39, ISSN 1542-7579, doi:10.1207/S15327760JPFM0201_4 
  97. Krueger, David; Mann, John David (2009), The Secret Language of Money: How to Make Smarter Financial Decisions and Live a Richer Life, McGraw Hill Professional, tr. 112–113, ISBN 978-0-07-162339-1, OCLC 277205993 
  98. 1 2 Nickerson 1998, tr. 192Lỗi harv: nhiều mục tiêu (2×): CITEREFNickerson1998 (trợ giúp)
  99. Goldacre 2008, tr. 233
  100. Singh, Simon; Ernst, Edzard (2008), Trick or Treatment?: Alternative Medicine on Trial, London: Bantam, tr. 287–288, ISBN 978-0-593-06129-9 
  101. Atwood, Kimball (2004), “Naturopathy, Pseudoscience, and Medicine: Myths and Fallacies vs Truth”, Medscape General Medicine 6 (1): 33 
  102. Neenan, Michael; Dryden, Windy (2004), Cognitive therapy: 100 key points and techniques, Psychology Press, tr. ix, ISBN 978-1-58391-858-6, OCLC 474568621 
  103. Blackburn, Ivy-Marie; Davidson, Kate M. (1995), Cognitive therapy for depression & anxiety: a practitioner's guide (ấn bản 2), Wiley-Blackwell, tr. 19, ISBN 978-0-632-03986-9, OCLC 32699443 
  104. Harvey, Allison G.; Watkins, Edward; Mansell, Warren (2004), Cognitive behavioural processes across psychological disorders: a transdiagnostic approach to research and treatment, Oxford University Press, tr. 172–173, 176, ISBN 978-0-19-852888-3, OCLC 602015097 
  105. Nickerson 1998, tr. 191–193Lỗi harv: nhiều mục tiêu (2×): CITEREFNickerson1998 (trợ giúp)
  106. Myers, D.G.; Lamm, H. (1976), “The group polarization phenomenon”, Psychological Bulletin 83 (4): 602–627, doi:10.1037/0033-2909.83.4.602  via Nickerson 1998, tr. 193–194Lỗi harv: nhiều mục tiêu (2×): CITEREFNickerson1998 (trợ giúp)
  107. Halpern, Diane F. (1987), Critical thinking across the curriculum: a brief edition of thought and knowledge, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, tr. 194, ISBN 978-0-8058-2731-6, OCLC 37180929 
  108. Roach, Kent (2010), “Wrongful Convictions: Adversarial and Inquisitorial Themes”, North Carolina Journal of International Law and Commercial Regulation 35, SSRN 1619124, Both adversarial and inquisitorial systems seem subject to the dangers of tunnel vision or confirmation bias. 
  109. Baron 2000, tr. 191,195
  110. Kida 2006, tr. 155
  111. Tetlock, Philip E. (2005), Expert Political Judgment: How Good Is It? How Can We Know?, Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, tr. 125–128, ISBN 978-0-691-12302-8, OCLC 56825108 
  112. “David Camm Blog: Investigation under fire”. WDRB. Ngày 10 tháng 10 năm 2013. 
  113. Kircher, Travis. “David Camm blogsite: opening statements”. WDRB. Truy cập ngày 3 tháng 1 năm 2014. 
  114. “David Camm v. State of Indiana” (PDF). Court of Appeals of Indiana. Ngày 15 tháng 11 năm 2011. 
  115. Boyd, Gordon (ngày 10 tháng 9 năm 2013). “Camm trial 9/10: Defense finds inconsistencies but can't touch Boney's past”. WBRC. 
  116. Zambroski,James. “Witness Says Prosecutor In First Camm Trial Blew Up When She Couldn't Link Camm's DNA To Boney's Shirt”. WAVE News. 
  117. Eisenmenger, Sarah (ngày 9 tháng 9 năm 2013). “Convicted Killer Charles Boney says David Camm was the shooter”. wave3. Truy cập ngày 5 tháng 1 năm 2014. 
  118. Eisenmenger, Sarah (9 tháng 9 năm 2013). “Convicted Killer Charles Boney says David Camm was the shooter”. wave3. 
  119. Adams, Harold J. (ngày 18 tháng 2 năm 2011). “David Camm's attorney's appeal ruling, seek prosecutor's removal”. Courier Journal, page B1. 
  120. David Camm verdict: NOT GUILTY, WDRB TV, ngày 24 tháng 10 năm 2013
  121. 1 2 Smith, Jonathan C. (2009), Pseudoscience and Extraordinary Claims of the Paranormal: A Critical Thinker's Toolkit, John Wiley and Sons, tr. 149–151, ISBN 978-1-4051-8122-8, OCLC 319499491 
  122. Randi, James (1991), James Randi: psychic investigator, Boxtree, tr. 58–62, ISBN 978-1-85283-144-8, OCLC 26359284 
  123. Nickerson 1998, tr. 190Lỗi harv: nhiều mục tiêu (2×): CITEREFNickerson1998 (trợ giúp)
  124. 1 2 Nickerson 1998, tr. 192–94Lỗi harv: nhiều mục tiêu (2×): CITEREFNickerson1998 (trợ giúp)
  125. 1 2 Koehler 1993
  126. 1 2 3 Mahoney 1977
  127. Proctor, Robert W.; Capaldi, E. John (2006), Why science matters: understanding the methods of psychological research, Wiley-Blackwell, tr. 68, ISBN 978-1-4051-3049-3, OCLC 318365881 
  128. Sternberg, Robert J. (2007), “Critical Thinking in Psychology: It really is critical.”, trong Sternberg, Robert J.; Roediger III, Henry L.; Halpern, Diane F., Critical Thinking in Psychology, Cambridge University Press, tr. 292, ISBN 0-521-60834-1, OCLC 69423179 
  129. Shadish, William R. (2007), “Critical Thinking in Quasi-Experimentation”, trong Sternberg, Robert J.; Roediger III, Henry L.; Halpern, Diane F., Critical Thinking in Psychology, Cambridge University Press, tr. 49, ISBN 978-0-521-60834-3 
  130. Shermer, Michael (tháng 7 năm 2006), “The Political Brain”, Scientific American, ISSN 0036-8733, truy cập ngày 14 tháng 8 năm 2009 
  131. PMID 21098355 (PMID 21098355)
    Citation will be completed automatically in a few minutes. Jump the queue or expand by hand
  132. Horrobin 1990
  133. 1 2 Swann, William B.; Pelham, Brett W.; Krull, Douglas S. (1989), “Agreeable Fancy or Disagreeable Truth? Reconciling Self-Enhancement and Self-Verification”, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (American Psychological Association) 57 (5): 782–791, ISSN 0022-3514, PMID 2810025, doi:10.1037/0022-3514.57.5.782 
  134. 1 2 Swann, William B.; Read, Stephen J. (1981), “Self-Verification Processes: How We Sustain Our Self-Conceptions”, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology (Academic Press) 17 (4): 351–372, ISSN 0022-1031, doi:10.1016/0022-1031(81)90043-3 
  135. Story, Amber L. (1998), “Self-Esteem and Memory for Favorable and Unfavorable Personality Feedback”, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin (Society for Personality and Social Psychology) 24 (1): 51–64, ISSN 1552-7433, doi:10.1177/0146167298241004 
  136. White, Michael J.; Brockett, Daniel R.; Overstreet, Belinda G. (1993), “Confirmatory Bias in Evaluating Personality Test Information: Am I Really That Kind of Person?”, Journal of Counseling Psychology (American Psychological Association) 40 (1): 120–126, ISSN 0022-0167, doi:10.1037/0022-0167.40.1.120 
  137. Swann, William B.; Read, Stephen J. (1981), “Acquiring Self-Knowledge: The Search for Feedback That Fits”, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (American Psychological Association) 41 (6): 1119–1128, ISSN 0022-3514 
  138. Shrauger, J. Sidney; Lund, Adrian K. (1975), “Self-evaluation and reactions to evaluations from others”, Journal of Personality (Duke University Press) 43 (1): 94–108, PMID 1142062, doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.1975.tb00574 

Tài liệu tham khảo

WikiPedia: Thiên_kiến_xác_nhận http://hosted.xamai.ca/confbias/ http://www.amazon.com/Emerging-Perspectives-Judgme... http://www.amazon.com/Handbook-Social-Psychology-S... http://www.boston.com/bostonglobe/ideas/articles/2... http://books.google.com/books?id=0SYVAAAAYAAJ&pg=P... http://web.mac.com/kstanovich/Site/YUP_Reviews_fil... http://www.myfoxal.com/story/23395758/camm-trial-9... http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=t... http://skepdic.com/confirmbias.html http://www.skepdic.com/backfireeffect.html